Return To 60’s Main Menu Recording Artists Of The 60s
JAYNETTS
“SALLY, GO ‘ROUND THE ROSES”
(Zell Sanders, Lona Stevens)
Tuff 369
No. 2 September 28, 1963
.
.
.
The girls came together in the Bronx, New York, in the mid-’50s, but the members would go and come and
go; things were very iffy and liquid then. Mary Sue Wells, Ethel Davis, Yvonne Bushnell, and Ada Ray
used to hang out with Zell Sanders, who was the entire staff of the Bronx-based J & S Record Company.
Zell had this odd little number, “Sally, Go ‘Round The Roses,” when Abner Spector of Tuff Records came
to town looking for some material and a girl group. The meeting of Spector, the fluid Jaynetts, and the
mystifying lyrical ambiguity of Zell’s “Sally” would culminate in the creation of a rock’n’roll classic.
Abner had been involved with acts like THE TUNE WEAVERS and THE CORSAIRS. In an interview with
Goldmine writer Aaron Fuchs, Johnnie Richardson (of JOHNNY & JOE fame) described the “Sally”
recording sessions and Abner’s tendency to go a bit over the top in the studio. “He took them in the
studio on a Friday and they didn’t get out of there until the next week. And he used everybody on that
track. Anybody [including Buddy Miles and pianist Artie Butler] that came in the studio that week he
would put them on. Originally, I think he had about 20 voices on that ‘Sally.”‘
The cost of that project alone, Richardson figures, was over $60,000–an unheard-of amount of money to
spend on recording a pop single in 1963. “Sally, Go ‘Round The Roses” is a timeless wonder of a song,
featuring an odd, hypnotic rhythm and soft voices seductively rising and falling. The lyrics seem to
portray Sally in an alluring field of roses, catching an eyeful of her lover with another. But differing
interpretations abound. Some listeners read the roses and the hushed throbbing of the music as
expressions of a young woman’s troubled acceptance of homosexuality. Others think that the song is
about a religious experience or possibly a mental breakdown. Still others remember “Sally” as nothing’
more than a silly nursery rhyme.